Nebraska Bishops Blast Trans Athletics Policy, Promote “At Birth” Proposal

bishop_james_d_conley_in_rome_italy_may_4_2012_2_cna_vatican_catholic_news_5_4_12
Bishop James Conley

Catholic officials in Nebraska balked at state education officials’ newly approved policy on transgender athletes, and they called attention to a church-proposed by-law change that would determine participation by a student’s assigned sex at birth.

On Thursday, the Nebraska School Activities Association Board of Directors approved, by a vote of 6-2, a policy that allows transgender high school students to play sports according to their gender identity. Evidence would be required of hormone therapy or gender confirming surgery to be reviewed by a state-level gender-eligibility committee, reported Omaha.com. LGBT advocates criticized the policy for creating a “rigorous and expensive process” and the ACLU warned it may violate federal non-discrimination law.

Regarding Catholic schools ability to exempt themselves from the policy, Omaha.com explained:

“Under the policy adopted by the NSAA board Thursday, a local school would determine whether to seek state permission for a transgender student to participate. That means that a parochial school with objections to transgender participation could decide not to forward an application to the NSAA. It would also mean that the local school would be the primary target for any litigation.”

The Nebraska Catholic Conference criticized the Board’s policy by issuing a joint statement from the state’s three bishops which called the new directive an “arbitrary, non-collaborative decision.”

Catholic leaders prefer the “at birth” bylaw change, which would override the Board’s policy if approved. This past week four of six regional NSAA districts voted for the “at birth” proposal, meaning it will considered in April by the Association’s Representative Assembly. It needs three-fifths approval from the 51 members to be implemented.

Opposition to any policy which would support and protect trans students is seemingly rooted in misunderstanding, even ignorance, of gender identity. A letter to the editor by Lincoln’s Bishop James Conley claimed any criteria besides assigned sex allows students to identify by a “gender identity of their own choosing.” He promoted the vicious myth that allowing trans people to use restrooms or locker rooms according to their gender identity is unsafe for others. He mentioned “respect, understanding, and compassion” for trans people–a phrase which is often used in relationship to lesbian and gay people.

Earlier this week,  I recommended that the church not accept simple answers on these complex matters. Bishop Conley’s line of thought, however, is a simple, reductionist critique of gender identity. His views do not engage the lived experience of trans communities, including Catholics, or to consider modern knowledge which contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of gender identity.

Each of the policies currently considered by the NSAA would leave trans students and Nebraska school athletics in a troubling uncertainty. If the “at birth proposal” loses in April, the Board’s flawed but marginally better policy would become permanent (barring legal challenges). If the “at birth” proposal advocated by church leaders succeeds, trans students will be further discriminated against and marginalized, in part, because of Catholics actions. All students in Nebraska’s schools, public and Catholic alike, deserve better policies than those proscribed by uninformed clerics and their staffs.

–Bob Shine, New Ways Ministry

4 thoughts on “Nebraska Bishops Blast Trans Athletics Policy, Promote “At Birth” Proposal

  1. John Hilgeman January 16, 2016 / 1:56 am

    I just don’t understand these men being so dogmatic about matters of which they know little or nothing. That goes for the whole area of human sexuality, not just LGBT issues. They all need some good, thorough courses on human sexuality before pontificating about things they don’t understand.

  2. Friends January 16, 2016 / 6:55 am

    This “bathroom bullying boondoggle” reminds me of something I observed while attending a concert at a local middle school, here in Western Massachusetts. The male rest rooms were labelled as follows:

    BOYS – GRADE 6
    BOYS – GRADE 7
    BOYS – GRADE 8
    MEN (TEACHERS AND STAFF)

    Apparently the older boys were bullying and harassing the younger boys in the rest rooms — thus provoking this radical segregation by age. The main link I see to the “TRANS” bullying issue is an appalling lack of mutual civility and tolerance among today’s up-and-coming students. I can’t speak to the situation among the girls — whose rest rooms were simply labelled “GIRLS”, and were not segregated by age. But if we can’t instill an attitude of mutual civility and tolerance — especially among younger male students who are growing up in today’s challenging world — we’re in for a heap of trouble down the line. The thuggish public attitude and behavior of one Donald Trump — easily reminiscent of what took place in Germany in the early 1930s — is not a promising omen.

  3. Patrick Gallagher January 16, 2016 / 5:44 pm

    The Church hierarchy are so out of touch with the majority of the people. They just can’t get away from their very narrow minded attitudes. This is exactly why the millenials are not accepting their teachings.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s