Archbishop Chaput’s Pastoral Restrictions Are a Losing Strategy

The following is a statement of Francis DeBernardo, New Ways Ministry’s Executive Director, released on July 6, 2016, in response to Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput’s new pastoral directives.

In a move which seems diametrically opposite to Pope Francis’ recent apostolic exhortation on marriage and family life, Philadelphia’s Archbishop Charles Chaput has instructed pastoral ministers in his archdiocese not to distribute communion to divorced/remarried and cohabitating couples, and not to allow individuals involved in same-sex relationships to occupy leadership or ministerial roles in parish life.  Chaput’s instruction came in a six-page document which he called “Pastoral Guidelines for Implementing Amoris Laetitia,” the apostolic exhortation that Pope Francis released in April. (For more information about the document, click here.)

Sacramental denials and restricting parish involvement are not effective pastoral strategies for the Church to be following.  Pope Francis’ emphasis has been to move away from such measures, and instead, offer an open and welcoming hand to all–even, and perhaps especially, to those whose lives do not always conform to all of the church’s official teachings.  Denials and restrictions will only cause more people to leave the Church, thus contributing to its demise, rather than towards building it up.  Chaput has offered a losing pastoral strategy.

Though this instruction will anger and frustrate many Catholics, whose hearts are much wider in accepting people regardless of their state in life, it is not a strategy that will pass the test of time.  It is just one more attempt to hold on to a model of church which has long been rendered obsolete.

Archbishop Charles Chaput

Chaput’s directives are distinctly at odds with the tone and recommendations of Amoris Laetitia which stressed church leaders should provide pastoral accompaniment and encounter, as well as encouragement, instead of discipline.  In many places, Chaput’s instruction reads schizophrenically, by emphasizing the need for such accompaniment, but then each time concluding with a recommendation that is a harsh restriction.

Chaput’s instructions should be, and most likely will be, ignored by pastoral ministers in his archdiocese.  They will most likely use their own pastoral judgement about administering sacraments and appointing people to ministerial and leadership roles.   Such is what happened last year when Newark’s Archbishop John Myers sent out similar instructions to pastoral staff in his archdiocese.  On the whole, the directives were ignored.

This issue becomes worrisome, though, because it is also very possible that self-appointed conservative “watchdogs” will take it upon themselves to report violations to the archdiocese.  Should this be what happens, then Chaput would have opened a Pandora’s box or problems for himself and the church of Philadelphia when dismissals and communion rejections become public, along with the guaranteed protests by Catholics who support those dismissed and rejected.

Because of these possibilities, in one sense Chaput’s instructions may end up being the straw that breaks the camel’s back.  With such an outpouring of protest, his leadership, already widely ignored, will become more irrelevant, paving the way for new leadership and directions for this archdiocese which has already had more than its share of tragedies caused by rigidly conservative leaders.

Also troubling is the fact that Chaput was recently named chair of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ committee to implement Amoris Laetitia nationally.  This archdiocesan document does not bode well for the direction this committee may take.  Since Chaput represents the most conservative wing of the U.S. church, it is unlikely that any recommendations which emerge will be useful to most bishops, who will likely take a more compassionate approach to implementing the apostolic exhortation than the narrow one that Chaput has offered.

–Francis DeBernardo, New Ways Ministry







21 thoughts on “Archbishop Chaput’s Pastoral Restrictions Are a Losing Strategy

  1. Will July 7, 2016 / 3:12 am

    The Archbishop attacks cohabiting, divorced and remarried and same-sex couples in the Church who are still attending and professing their faith. This group that he has selected out for regular humiliation and overt public shaming is by its very nature one of evident strong faith and determination to remain part of the Catholic church. These are people who despite already being under such clouds of doctrinal disapproval still answer the Roman Catholic call in their hearts. Surely this brave band has people who have especially strong gifts to offer to parish life? Indeed many who might qualify for this ‘group’ will have walked away from the Church some time ago.

    I agree with your observations, Francis, that many will simply ignore this. But if no formal response comes from higher up then there is tacit approval. And as you point out, Chaput actually has the most senior role in the US as responder to Amoris Laetitia. This will do damage. How long before the awful Bill Donohue is on CNN extolling his virtues and weaponising these comments in his attacks on gay people?

    Chaput’s whole response makes for unpleasant reading – one moment dripping with condescending calls for patronising ‘sensitivity’ and the next moment sticking the knife in. For example: “two persons in an active, public same-sex relationship, no matter how sincere, offer a serious counter-witness to Catholic belief, which can only produce moral confusion in the community.”

  2. lynne1946 July 7, 2016 / 3:19 am

    How quickly is Pope Francis made aware of things like this, do you think?

    • poolgirl2 July 7, 2016 / 7:50 am

      It would seem that Pope Francis condones and implicitly supports this man. Archbishop Chaput seems to have no guidance to change his language or his hateful stances from the Pope. Surely the Pope is contact with such a “high official”of the Church. Chaput is not some rogue priest deemed to be ignored, but rather an “official” wielding a lot of negative power.

  3. Tom Bower July 7, 2016 / 8:01 am

    I am numb to statements from the hierarchy. To broaden Sr. Jeannine’s statement to interact with the official Church is to participate in our oppression. Where is the Joy of Love in Chaput’s statement? Given his position his is not a wild hair, but a sign of the rotten core of those who have taken the Church from its members. I suggest all Catholics who believe in Christ’s love withhold any contributions to the church and give them to organization that truly reflect His mission.

  4. Maryann Vitelli July 7, 2016 / 8:22 am

    So a gay person living a lie by not being true to himself/herself is accepted by the Church; but a gay person who is true to who God made him/her to be, is not. Why would any openly gay person or his/her family want to be part of a Church that clearly rejects him/her?

  5. Wilhelm Wonka July 7, 2016 / 8:26 am

    Chaput is kaput. He needs to go. And Francis needs to heed.

  6. Thomas July 7, 2016 / 8:35 am

    The Pope takes a step forward and the Cardinals take two steps back. Will we ever be welcomed? This is not at all encouraging. If the Church continues to limit its congregation to only those whose sexuality is in line with their imaginations , they will be preaching to empty pews.

  7. Jim McCrea July 7, 2016 / 12:41 pm

    Just one more validation of my decision to leave this cult far behind.

  8. Paula Mattras July 7, 2016 / 4:23 pm

    I am stunned. God bless and protect all our children who are ALWAYS OUR CHILDREN and HIS creation as well. Shunning and refusing are not reflections of the examples Jesus gave to us.

  9. Bishop Carlos A Florido, osf July 7, 2016 / 7:23 pm

    Chaput’s pastoral restrictions are unrealistic and and an insult to LGBT people.

  10. Kevin Coyle July 7, 2016 / 7:37 pm

    I live in the Archdiocese of Baltimore, Maryland. It’s leader is Archbishop William Lori. I have never heard Archbishop Lori say anything supportive or critical of gay and lesbian people. Does New Ways Ministries know how this church leader thinks about this issue?

  11. Friends July 7, 2016 / 9:35 pm

    Chaput is clearly a genetic clone of Cardinal “Capa Magna Studded-Gloves” Burke — whom Pope Francis busted out of his pretensions, and then consigned him to a sinecure caretaker position with the Knights of Malta. What has happened to our much-admired Pope Francis? He promised great progressive changes in our Church — and we rallied joyfully behind his initiatives. But now he allows Chaput to get away with Burke-esque anti-pastoral dictates like this? Something has gone badly awry within the governance of the Church.

  12. Bob Burns July 8, 2016 / 9:16 am

    Even Jesus makes mistakes, look at Chaput , it has to be a mistake. How can the Catholic’s of Philadelphia be so unlucky to wind up with so many conservative bishops. So far he is the one bishop that is so far in left filed. Pope Francis has to clean the house in the archdiocese of Philadelphia. How much longer can the members of the Philadelphia Archdiocese continue to keep their faith?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s